The blue shadow is not typical of chromatic aberation since the red component is missing. The inset shows the blue shadow varies in direction from the dominate direction- not typical if it was from a lens aberation. It's also important to notice the inset area in in a shadowed area, thus greatly reducing the possibility of aberations there.

SEE THE LATEST UPDATE: http://www.kbvp.com/photo/california-ufo-drone-propulsion-analysis

I find this anomaly is as much interest as the "drone" itself. I originally enlarged and enhanced object "B" to create the inset "C". (see original photo and analysis) To see a better view, I turned the image to black and white, added a layer of "etch", and added a bit more contrast. The effect of this modification results in a better idea of the objects three dimensional shape.

The sightings of this UFO "Drone" in parts of California have piqued the interest of many people.

I picked this photo "A" due to what at first appeared a dust spot "B". I cropped around the spot and increased the size and pixels to gain resolution. I then applied more contrast and sharpening. The result is what appears to be another object "C". There is no indication this photo is faked. *note* I added further analysis and an enhanced photo of this anomaly. see: analysis of inset figure "B" anomaly (posted 14 July, 2007)

Inset "D" shows a close-up as the "drone" passes overhead. There are several curved components that rise vertically from the circular hub. The enlargements "E" and "F" show the detail of these components. These are very thin and quite symmetrical despite the objects motion.

Inset "G" is from a separate observation over 200 miles to the west. Notice the "drone" has additional hardware added. These are two separate but similar attachments with three spikes protruding from each.