Now we have the "Isaac" documents from the CARET program. After sorting through "Isaac's" story, I find it full of holes. After you read through the material in the links below, you will probably have the same conclusions.
- He is worried about his safety, but throughout the story he gives himself away by being too detailed in his job description.
- The location and description of the building is too weak.
- What was the fake business name for the office complex?
The sightings of this UFO "Drone" in parts of California have piqued the interest of many people.
I picked this photo "A" due to what at first appeared a dust spot "B". I cropped around the spot and increased the size and pixels to gain resolution. I then applied more contrast and sharpening. The result is what appears to be another object "C". There is no indication this photo is faked. *note* I added further analysis and an enhanced photo of this anomaly. see: analysis of inset figure "B" anomaly (posted 14 July, 2007)
Inset "D" shows a close-up as the "drone" passes overhead. There are several curved components that rise vertically from the circular hub. The enlargements "E" and "F" show the detail of these components. These are very thin and quite symmetrical despite the objects motion.
Inset "G" is from a separate observation over 200 miles to the west. Notice the "drone" has additional hardware added. These are two separate but similar attachments with three spikes protruding from each.